Sunday, September 25, 2011

Interactive Whiteboards

Since I attended high school, one of the most significant differences I find in schools today is the implementation of interactive whiteboards.



Over a decade ago, a forward-thinking World Geography teacher of mine integrated "clicker quizzes" into our classroom. Each day, we copied outlines of notes from the chalkboard into our notebooks. We were assigned lists of dates to memorize from Charlemagne to the Cold War. Our class was the perfect non-example of student-centered instruction. But then, on quiz day, we had remote controls in our hands pointed at the large analog TV on a cart at the front of the room. We received immediate feedback and were provided with class data by the end of the assessment. As students, we knew we were on the cutting edge of a shift in education.




Check out Jeffrey Branzburg's article for Tech & Learning. He outlines a few different ideas for using interactive whiteboards in the classroom (2007):

  • Recording
  • Graphic Organizers
  • Presentations
  • Interactive Software
  • Google Earth
  • Interactive Mathematics
  • Quizzes and Games


Today, I teach ESL Reading/Language Arts in a small middle school with very little funding in the heart of the fourth largest city in America. I consider myself abundantly blessed to have access to a document camera, projector, and a Mimio Interactive Whiteboard. As teachers, we guard this technology with our lives. If a screw comes loose on the stand, I'm tempted to put up caution tape to protect the board from any further damage. Technology is not easy to come by when the budget is tight.

At the very least, the Mimio board is a very expensive projector screen. Add in the interactive pen and notebook software, and you start getting somewhere. At the board, you can do anything you would otherwise do on a computer. Mimio has a wonderful community for collaboration where teachers can search for educator-created, student-centered lessons by subject, age, or keyword. At the end of his article, Branzburg (2007) offers links to lessons created for other interactive whiteboard brands, such as:
  • Dukane
  • Interwrite Learning
  • Luidia
  • Numonics
  • PolyVision
  • Promethean
  • Smart Technologies


Another one of my favorites is Prezi - taking your PowerPoint presentations to the next level. Combining the power of Prezi and Mimio, my first day of school presentation this year was a great success. The same presentation could be modified for Open House, as well.




When the budget allows, classroom technology can open up a world of possibilities for educators and their pupils.

What we cannot do is allow the interactive whiteboard to take over. The Mathematics Education Research Journal reported, "There is little doubt that IWBs [Interactive WhiteBoards] have the potential to enhance learners’ opportunities...However, by themselves tools will not transform pedagogy, no matter what their potential" (Zevenbergen & Lerman, 2008). Teachers may be enticed by the prepackaged lessons and abandon any attempt to adjust instruction based on student need.

The bottom line is: Educate yourself. Take the extra time to discover the possibilities of the interactive whiteboard, but don't let it run the classroom. Instead, let it guide your students into a greater level of engagement and, ultimately, a deeper understanding of the knowledge they are trying to gain.




Branzburg, J. (2007, September 15). Whiteboards at your service. Tech and Learning, 28(2), 38. Retrieved from http://www.techlearning.com/article/Whiteboards-at-Your-Service/44575

Zevenbergen, R., & Lerman, S. (2008). Learning environments using interactive whiteboards: new learning spaces or reproduction of old technologies? . Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(1), 108-126. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ798610

Saturday, September 17, 2011

Rosetta Stone in the Classroom

As a middle school ESL teacher, I am constantly searching for the best ways to reach all of my students, each coming from a diverse background. In the Houston Independent School District alone, there are approximately 66,000 Limited English Proficient students. That number is larger than the total enrollment of most school districts in the U.S. In our very diverse part of Houston, Texas, the LEP population at my school is about two-thirds Hispanic and one-third African refugee students.



In the face of budget cuts, campus LEP Coordinators are tasked with individually deciding how to spend their Title III funds to best serve their English Language Learners. One suggestion I received from the district was to invest in the Rosetta Stone American English Levels 1-5 software.


Check out how much
Rosetta Stone loves teachers.


Did any other teachers jump up and down like I did?



Rosetta Stone advertises that their educational solutions are:
  • intuitive
  • interactive
  • visually engaging


Isn't that what we all want as educators when it comes to integrating technology for our ELLs?

What we DON'T want is to waste time.

An article examining the value of "edutainment" software suggests the following list of questions and rubric to help teachers, administrators, and curriculum specialists select educational software (Kanzanci & Okan, 2009):


• What is the point of having this subject/activity/exercise on computer?

• Is the content of the software complying with what is intended to be taught?
• Do the activities in the software really provide gains to the learner? Or they are just robotic?

• Do the activities support learners to ask questions or create new insight?
• Does the software fit the level of the learner?
• Do the activities include so much fun elements which cover the learning?
• Are the activities drowning in flashy animations and effects with noises?

• Do the learners waste time with the program?


(click image to enlarge)


















Rosetta Stone has some case studies from the classroom available on the website. In the coming months, I will be putting Rosetta Stone to the test. I'll be sure to keep readers informed of my progress. In the meantime, do any educators out there have experience incorporating Rosetta Stone or a similar software into the language development of their ELLs?




Bentzman, J. (2008, November 18). Texas - english - k-12. Retrieved from http://www.rosettastone.com/schools/solutions/standards

Kazanci, Z. & Okan, Z. (2009). Evaluating english language teaching software for kids: education or entertainment or both?. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(3), 30-38. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ859490